The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think is this happening? How does it affect individuals and the community?
In the past, tradition and cultural values were being following by people where cuisine was being served together for every member have been getting doom in this world. People believe that we are loosing our ethical and tradition values from our societies and causing severe low family's member affection and love as a result. In this essay, I will discuss reasons and influences on our society and give a logical conclusion.
Firstly, the glimpse of group activities such as eating cuisine, celebrating festivals are getting diminished. Working away from parents is one these reasons where people are compelled to work and force to have family gap. For example Students study in college are staying far away from family play a crucial role to volatile the bounding. In addition, due to requirement some people are living in nuclear family where they become selfish and have no opportunities to take care there parents. Reason is anything but our requirements are changing this small world to bitter level.
Secondly, there are numerous bitter influences which can be seen in every societies. Affection of love and caring are getting diminished to a large extent. For example, child living with their parents in nuclear family far away from there grand parents is compelled to forget them if not has frequent visit. Some important cultural events are missed by such people , as a result , outlook of these wonderful immense events become volatile.
In recapitulate, people loosing a thread to bundle with origin's tradition and become witness not to indulge in important activity such as group eating, festivals. I would recommend that people should visit their homes to witness as bounding and love.
- Nowadays families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 85
- Extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc are dangerous and should be banned. Agree or disagree? 72
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 78
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Other believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large business which can make a difference. Discuss th 77
- The role of human cloning has accelerated rapidly. To what extent you think will it replace the material things? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...society and give a logical conclusion. Firstly, the glimpse of group activities...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ging this small world to bitter level. Secondly, there are numerous bitter infl...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ultural events are missed by such people , as a result , outlook of these wonderfu...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... are missed by such people , as a result , outlook of these wonderful immense even...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15942028986 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53548900972 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8385596023 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112113597497 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373665924869 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031416537972 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660821004673 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419286102712 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.