Questions: In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or a negative development?
Consumerism tells people about the various kinds of products. Therefore, people nowadays visit mega shopping centres to buy their chosen commodities instead of going to tiny local shops. As a consequence, regional small shops tend to be closed. This essay will discuss both views before concluding any remarks.
Firstly, local small shops play many crucial roles in past years to fulfill the partial demands of their customers although people do not get their preferable goods in there. For example, small shops in many developing countries only offer daily necessities to their customers. As a result, people bound to buy only those products without arguing. Even though, local shopkeeper keep extra money from their customers by showing lame excuses such as transport cost. Despite all these, one positive argument is that local shops can provide the chance to pay money after selling their products based on the neighborhood relation. But this phenomenon is totally absent in the shopping centre.
However, mega shopping centres are a result of strong economy of a nation. Most people visit there to buy their selective cloths, goods and many other products. In shopping malls, we can see various types of shops. As a consequence, a customer can bargain about the price whereas local shops have no way to deal with the price. In addition, people can visit there to spends some free times with their friends and relatives because many shopping centers provide entertainment facilities, for example, Jamuna future parks. Furthermore, most of the mega shopping centres are very clean and tidy along with air-conditioned. So, customers can easily be convinced by the shopping center decorations. It is felt that people earn money much more than in previous time thus, they developed their desires and thoughts. Furthermore, the government earns also revenue in each year from the shopping malls.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that it is indeed a debatable issue which needs further analysis and discussion. However, in the light of above plausible argument along with example, it would be quite safe to conclude that this is a positive developments to visit shopping centres.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-29 | Madhumuppa | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-29 | Madhumuppa | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | zhouhaibo | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-29 | Madhumuppa | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-29 | Madhumuppa | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in each year from the shopping malls. To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying ...
^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'development'?
Suggestion: development
...afe to conclude that this is a positive developments to visit shopping centres.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22379603399 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63718836966 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592067988669 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7214418662 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8095238095 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8095238095 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342701393081 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099009828946 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600404072796 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198579171049 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749059655145 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.