Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Parents are the first mentor of their children. It is highly debatable issue prevailing presently that parents should be held legally responsible for the children’s act. Some parents are talking in accord with above statement while other parents believe that they don’t take account of their children’s attitude. This essay is going to deliver indispensable arguments before reaching a conclusion.
Parenting plays the focal role in children’s upbringing. To begin with the positive note, children absorb and imitate what they observe from their parents and surrounding. Further, they spend more time with their parents in childhood. So mostly they pick up language, culture and etiquettes by observing their parents. If parents are having faith and good ways, their children will become more likely with vision in life and have good practices. For instance, after Thomas Alva Edison’s school teacher called him mentally ill, Edison’s mother hid the letter from the young inventor and homeschooled him so that he could reach his full potential.
In addition, responsible parenting encompasses not only taking care of children’s basic needs but also teaching social conduct and discipline to them. Furthermore, parents should take accountability for the damages caused by their children in the society. For example, the leading actor Jackie Chan had taken responsibility for his son’s drug use and express regret to the public on behalf of him by telling that he failed to be a good father.
To sum up, with the above points, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that parents are solely and legally held for the children’s act.
- Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studyingthe past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two viewsand give your own opinion. 65
- Government should reduce their investments in arts, music, and painting. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 95
- What is your opinion about top executives at companies getting their employees involved in the decision-making process? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50193050193 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0099787827 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629343629344 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2552772131 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424258689838 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157818736452 0.0925447433944 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138459263612 0.071462118173 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291466495941 0.151781067708 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884692257623 0.0609392437508 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.