The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The line graph:
The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words
ANSWER:
The line chart desmonstrates relative changes in price for three different food product groups together with the consumer-price index from 1979 to 2009.
Looking at the chart, it is immediately obvious that the figure saw an increase in trend of price changes for the three food product groups over the course of 30 years. Although there was the same of gradual growth over years, the price changes in fresh fruits-vegetables was higher than that in Sugar-sweets and carbonated drinks.
In the 1979-1987 period, the price for these groups almost same change together with CPI. There are some fluctuation of them but not much, which rose gradually from 60 in 1979 to 100 in 1985. The fresh fruits – vegetables and sugar – sweets were much more different sinifican changing with CPI in 1981 and 1984, respectively.
After 1987, the price for CPI rose steadily to 210 in 2009. Price for fresh fruits – vegetables always remained above the Consumer-price index over the period and increased sharply to 350 at the end of period. By contrast, the price for sugar-sweets and Carbonated drinks were lower than CPI. Although the price for sugar-sweets higher than that in carbonated drinks, in the following years, these groups showed a similar growth trend. They also reached the highest point of the whole line graph in 2009, sugar-sweets reach a peak 200 and carbonated drinks reach a peak 150.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-18 | RoseNguyen | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds ofmeat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Writ 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits andvegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph: The graph below shows relative price cha...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere relevant. Write at least 150 words ANSWER: The line chart desmonstrate...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Write at least 150 words ANSWER: The line chart desmonstrates relative ch...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsumer-price index from 1979 to 2009. Looking at the chart, it is immediately ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Sugar-sweets and carbonated drinks. In the 1979-1987 period, the price for t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 937.175257732 152% => OK
No of words: 279.0 206.0 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12186379928 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68597759892 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 127.690721649 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523297491039 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 290.88556701 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.6767628856 44.8134815571 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 76.5299724578 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 4.34317383033 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440505144783 0.216113520407 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171887386366 0.0766984524023 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165458208262 0.0603063233224 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288790436615 0.12726935374 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.271999021966 0.0580467560999 469% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 8.37731958763 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 7.59969072165 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.