Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of developing imagination and language skills by reading books, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of TV in hindering in development of necessary skills has sparked over the potential impact of this trend on our lives in recent years. It can be agreed that people reading books develop more skills than those who watches TV, but there are some drawbacks as well. This essay will discuss both positive and negative impacts and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons to explain how more skills are develop by reading books, but the most conspicuous one is rooted in the fact that people will develop patients in long and lengthy written material, which certainly develop skills such as attention, creativity in the people. For an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals student who are studying law are more smart and creative because they have to read long lengthy acts and laws books. Thus, it is apparent that reading book develops more skills such as healthy and active mind.
Nevertheless, opponents of this trend tend to believe that TV develops more skills than reading books by giving people peaceful mind and entertainment, which certainly helps to reduce the stress in the people. For example, a new research from Harvard University reveals, student s who prefer to watch TV are more relaxed and peaceful,, they are more productive. Therefore, it is obviously true that watching TV also develop various useful skills.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that reading books will develop more useful and better skills than watching TV, although there are few drawbacks that need to be well handled.
- It is said that for some developed countries, tourism may cause some disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? 85
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Do you think formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge of students? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
... reasons to explain how more skills are develop by reading books, but the most conspicu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: new research
... the stress in the people. For example, a new research from Harvard University reveals, studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...o watch TV are more relaxed and peaceful,, they are more productive. Therefore, it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15734265734 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61998258928 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562937062937 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8078535262 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457218067333 0.242375264174 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185432887478 0.0925447433944 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15208106856 0.071462118173 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286397480535 0.151781067708 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754718217846 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.