In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Banning plastic bags as an approach to prevent environmental degradation and pollution is a controversial issue. I completely agree with this issue because plastic bags have harmful effects on humans and animals and banning the use of them would be perfectly beneficial. This essay is going to support this idea in details and give some more specific examples.
Plastic bags are manufactured using nonrenewable resources such as petroleum which can be used for many other important productions instead. Nonrenewable resources are priceless and it is not worth to use them to produce plastic bags just for carrying goods. In addition, these types of bags often contain polyethylene and cannot biodegrade. It means that if they are not recycled or disposed of properly, they become pollution like commonly see alongside the roads or floating in the water. Thus, putting a halt to plastic bags not only decline plastic pollution and litter but also save the valuable resources for more beneficial products.
Furthermore, these plastic bags litter are often mistaken for food by animals such as marine or birds. This endangered animals by choking, poisoning or entanglement which can result in death. In addition, another possible negative point of using plastic bags could be that millions of dollars are spent each year in litter clean-up costs which could spend in more efficient purposes such as education improvements issues or poverty eradication. Hence, forbidding the plastic bags usage can reduce its harmful effects on wildlife and human beings.
To conclude, reducing the litter and plastic pollution and impact on wildlife could be some of the benefits of banning the plastic bags. I completely agree that countries and governments put a halt to plastic ban use in order to prevent environmental pollution and protect wildlife.
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference Write a letter to formal teacher In your letter Give detail of the job Explain why it is important to you Suggest what information your teacher could out in the reference 91
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of often products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of t 56
- some people think that cars should be banned from large citie. to what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- more information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree with the statement 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...llution and impact on wildlife could be some of the benefits of banning the plastic bags. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3470790378 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82173065434 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549828178694 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8866911794 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215747733671 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810383441071 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341077055552 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144266760821 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313142306979 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.