Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
The importance of serving the first punishment, which was debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of repeating crime after serving punishment has sparked controversy on the potential impact of this trend in our society, in recent years. It can be said, offenders often repeat there crime and end up back in prisons; because they believe the law and order is not strong enough. This essay will elaborate why law and order need to make sure first time punishment are strict and provide solutions to overcome this issue and thus, will lead to a logical solution.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why, after first time serving punishment the offenders are back in pension again, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, offenders believe that they will be left with slap on their writs. Example for instance, according to a leading Human Behaviour Centre Research, small crimes led to bigger once, and their level of audacity increases if the punishment by the authorities was not strict. furthermore, reason why first punishment crime committers return to prisoner due to leniency shown by law and order towards the offender.
Another reason why first time offenders should not be shown no sympathy with their crime, must be analysed to solve the issue of committing crime in future, is because regulations can be implemented to minimise the crime done by first time offenders and thus, will result in reducing the strain on the society. For instance, revoking their welfare privileges, travel ban, regular police checkup and compulsory community service for life long. Based on that, it can be agreed that, crime officers retuning to person can be controlled if there were enough collaborations.
For what has been said above, it can be concluded that first punishment is prominent, but solutions to overcome this issue should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-11 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
- The only thing that interfere with my leaning is my education- Einstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct? 75
- The only thing that interfere with my leaning is my education- Einstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct? 77
- Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 77
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished people influence on the regions they belong to? 77
- Do you think the consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ment by the authorities was not strict. furthermore, reason why first punishment crime comm...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... to solve the issue of committing crime in future, is because regulations can be implemen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67594984935 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9659347098 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.454545455 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336606150267 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124453375605 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659611356542 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210582642444 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519831989425 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.