The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the usa in the 1980s and the 1990s.
The given circular charts depict the information about by five main sources of energy in the U S A in the given years 1980 to 1990.The data is caliborated in percentum.
It can be seen,that the charts information about main sources of energy in U S A.In 1980,start with oil 42% in contrast,in 1990 was oil decreased 33%.In addition to this,the natural gas source was26% in 1980 not only but also in 1990 was declined natural gas 25%.Moreover,in 1980 was 22% coal source Although,was suddenly boost coal source 5% in 1990.
As fas as trendis concerned hydroelectric power was used in 5% in 1980 while it was similar percentage in 1990.A part from all this nuclear gas was 5 % used in 1980 but in contrary,it was steeply surge 5% in 1990.Futhetmore one live with respectively.
overall,it is eveident that the highest percentage observed was oil whereas from the lowezt percentage source was hydroelectric power in given year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Kamal1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | green1222 | 78 | view |
- some people believe that travelling within a city is better by car while some other think bicycle is a better means.Discuss both sides and given your opinion. 56
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the usa in the 1980s and the 1990s. 73
- The given diagram shows the natural water purification system. 11
- some people believe that travelling within a city is better by car while some other think bicycle is a better means.Discuss both sides and given your opinion. 56
- Caring for children is very important for our society therefore all mother and father should take a childcare training course to what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e U S A in the given years 1980 to 1990.The data is caliborated in percentum. It...
^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , that
...iborated in percentum. It can be seen,that the charts information about main sourc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'charts'' or 'chart's'?
Suggestion: charts'; chart's
...n percentum. It can be seen,that the charts information about main sources of energ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...n about main sources of energy in U S A.In 1980,start with oil 42% in contrast,in ...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...A.In 1980,start with oil 42% in contrast,in 1990 was oil decreased 33%.In addition ...
^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... contrast,in 1990 was oil decreased 33%.In addition to this,the natural gas source...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...as oil decreased 33%.In addition to this,the natural gas source was26% in 1980 not o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...so in 1990 was declined natural gas 25%.Moreover,in 1980 was 22% coal source Although,wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...90 was declined natural gas 25%.Moreover,in 1980 was 22% coal source Although,was s...
^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , was
...ver,in 1980 was 22% coal source Although,was suddenly boost coal source 5% in 1990. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'boosted'.
Suggestion: boosted
...s 22% coal source Although,was suddenly boost coal source 5% in 1990. As fas as tr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...while it was similar percentage in 1990.A part from all this nuclear gas was 5 % ...
^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...gas was 5 % used in 1980 but in contrary,it was steeply surge 5% in 1990.Futhetmore...
^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'surged'.
Suggestion: surged
... in 1980 but in contrary,it was steeply surge 5% in 1990.Futhetmore one live with res...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Futhetmore
...ontrary,it was steeply surge 5% in 1990.Futhetmore one live with respectively. overall,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...thetmore one live with respectively. overall,it is eveident that the highest percent...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...e one live with respectively. overall,it is eveident that the highest percentage...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95541401274 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05199822381 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0765258987 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.5 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.25 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.25 5.23603664747 310% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 1.69756097561 1001% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118534952732 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830940266627 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680468437061 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830940266627 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680468437061 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.