tpo 16
The reading states that the growth of human population in the US decreases the number of birds population and provides three reasons of support. However, The professor says that the evidence of reading is not convincing and refutes each of the reasons.
First, the bird habitats have destroyed because of building home and mall for humans. The professor opposes this point by saying that it is true that the population of a group of birds declines but it is not right about all of the birds. In the urban areas, as an example, many people complain about the increase of some types of birds including pigeons. As a result, declining a uniform type of a bird does not mean that the number of all bird has reduced.
Second, the article claims that the growth of agriculture will result in further birds habitat destruction. However, the professor claims that currently less land is used for agriculture. The growth of agriculture is because of introducing new crops, new foods and new technologies. As a result, we do not need to destroy habitats of the birds to equip farmers with new lands.
Third, the reading states that use of chemical pesticides is harmful to birds and will decrease the number of them in the future. The professor refutes this point by saying that nowadays people are aware of consequences of using pesticides in the agriculture and because of that there are 2 main changes in the agriculture sector. First, introducing new pesticides that are not harmful to humans and environment. Second, farmers are inclining toward produce pesticide-resistant crops. This crops will reduce chemical usage of pesticides and don not harm human and birds at all.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- tpo 07 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Young people today are less dependent on their parents than young people in the past 90
- construction in countrysides (attempt 2) 76
- Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...irds declines but it is not right about all of the birds. In the urban areas, as an exampl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'type of'.
Suggestion: type of
...geons. As a result, declining a uniform type of a bird does not mean that the number of a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of all bird has reduced. Second, the article claims that the growth of ag...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hanges in the agriculture sector. First, introducing new pesticides that are not ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95035460993 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76862028578 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478723404255 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8333164129 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0666666667 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0654931902748 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263698682685 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196139359853 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417188153816 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171145534537 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.