The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In the first glance, it might be tempting to support that forcing illegal immigrants to return to their countries would be the best approach. Nevertheless, to understand the context of this excerpt in detail, further evidence would be required to reach a justified conclusion.
The author mentions that the autonomy is based on the strength of the border and economy and national identity could be endangered. This holds true in certain aspects as immigrants lead to increasing the population and overburdening the government to fulfil their needs. However, this holds true if they are not returning back to the nation. Not all immigrants might pose a threat to the country, and a good example for this is immigrants from Bangladesh who enter India in hope for jobs. While, it is definitely illegal to enter a nation without authority, these people work in East India, primarily West Bengal as farmers and assist in paddy cultivation. Some of them even open small businesses to cater to their families.
Secondly, the author emphasises on the fact that unchecked immigrants must be sent back forcefully in every scenario. Though, there is no evidence or data on why exactly people were migration into this nation. It could be in search of better job prospects, while there could be more serious scenarios where the immigrant's country is in a completely inhospitable state- were struck with a calamity or stricken with a widespread disease. In situations like these, it is inhumane to forcefully send back the immigrants to live precariously in their country, and hence proper measures should be taken to ensure that the people are safe.
Therefore, before taking the huge step of compulsively returning immigrants from a country, investigations should be conducted to understand the reason of their shifting and secondly what exactly they intend to do while in the nation. Precautionary measures should be taken to avoid mishaps, but judicious steps should be in place to tackle such scenarios without depriving them of human needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | nikki1610 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Mat Pro | 69 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | bishal sitaula | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Roshan Dhakal | 59 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | man_si_jain | 72 | view |
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your p 72
- The first step to self-knowledge is the rejection of the familiar. 66
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 94
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 70
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling r 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
minimum 3 arguments wanted.
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 331 350
No. of Characters: 1669 1500
No. of Different Words: 186 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.265 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.042 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.779 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.583 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.296 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.568 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...equired to reach a justified conclusion. The author mentions that the autonomy is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...owever, this holds true if they are not returning back to the nation. Not all immigrants might...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l businesses to cater to their families. Secondly, the author emphasises on the f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aken to ensure that the people are safe. Therefore, before taking the huge step o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 328.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25914634146 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12286661265 2.78398813304 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557926829268 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.8473053892 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.582400951 57.8364921388 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 191.666666667 119.503703932 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.4444444444 23.324526521 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.70786347227 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17270208112 0.218282227539 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069074871136 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522402952898 0.0701772020484 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104938061487 0.128457276422 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306208025268 0.0628817314937 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 14.3799401198 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 48.3550499002 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.197005988 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32208582834 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.1389221557 147% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.9071856287 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.