Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Student’s academic performance should be used as an indicator for teachers’ salaries. I fully disagree with this statement because it would place an unfair amount of pressure on teachers, which could lead to manipulation of grades or use of unorthodox teaching methods. Despite being a laudable idea as this would encourage instructors to put give extra effort and attention to their students, it is not sustainable.
Ina society where humans are motivated by money, it is easy to see how one could fall into the temptation of doing everything possible to make more money. Teachers are humans and as also motivated by money. So you can imagine the length they might go to ensure that they receive fat paychecks at the end of the month. For example, a teacher might manipulate student’s grade in other to ensure outstanding class performance. This would in turn give a distorted view of the student’s performance which might affect him/her in the future. Although critics might argue that examination is not the true test of knowledge. It gives a good estimate of children’s capabilities.
Another point to note is that everyone is not created equal; hence the brain capabilities of students vary from one individual to another. Some students learn very fast and would excel academically, while some might require special attention. In other words, the performance of different students is really not a measure of how great a teacher is. Basing salaries on student’s performance would put an unfair amount of pressure on the instructor and would indirectly suggest that the brain capability of a child is in the teacher’s hands.
Lastly, an indirect effect of this action could result in the use of unorthodox method to teach students and would remove focus from the main objective of teaching. The purpose of a teacher is to help students learn new things, once salaries are based on performance, the main objective would be redirected from learning new things to receiving fat paychecks at the end of the month. This could lead to unorthodox methods of teaching i.e instilling fear into the pupils and setting impossible demands on them.
Even though this is a laudable idea that would encourage teachers to work hard and pay more attention to students, it is not sustainable and would have negative impacts In the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 54
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 62
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 63
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 58
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ich might affect him/her in the future. Although critics might argue that examination is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, lastly, really, so, still, while, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12661498708 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98654806023 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532299741602 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0982913906 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204409424344 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656907034361 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662315110022 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108654406269 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632095078336 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.