The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem. What problem will this shortage of time causes.
The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life was always a debatable topic. Many people believe that this shortage of time leads to many family problems and damages human relationships. I personally believe that not giving enough time to personal life might lead to dispute between husband and wife. This essay would further elaborate the problems caused by giving little space for personal life with reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, due to high increase in unemployment rate and tough competition for jobs, employees are trying their level best outputs to the company by working long hours in office. Spending long hours in office, pressure from managers and project deadlines created by clients are causing people to lose their personal space which indeed leading them to start ignoring personal lives. It creates disputes among families and between husband and spouse which might lead to divorce. For example, because of extreme pressure on employees to deliver the product on time will make them to work on weekends and not providing enough time to their families.
Secondly, increased standard of living, variations in lifestyles, project deadlines and competitive market can cause stress for the employees. For instance, recent study conducted on software employees by University of California showed that out of 100 employees 88 people are suffering from stress and depression because of the pressure. Furthermore, it is the responsible of company and managers to provide space between personal lives and professional careers.
According to the arguments aforementioned, health balance between personal life and professional life is required to lead a prosperous life and further the organisations need to bring some policies that benefits employees to lead happy and spend good time with their families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | ecxr | 85 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
- Actions Speak louder than words. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Do you think that English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation? 77
- Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 72
- Does e-book replace the printed book? why? 55
- Will E-books replace the printed books or not? why? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42268041237 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72543906397 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6070784465 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348554920022 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135552672811 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141061908974 0.071462118173 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200867504115 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171751952965 0.0609392437508 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.