Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is so easy to realize that traffic accidents are very high every year. To decrease traffic accidents some people think that stric punishments for driving are the key, others believe that another solution would be more effective. In my opinion, both view can used together to control traffic accidents.
There are various reasons why they believe strict punishments are the key for traffic accidents. First cause, strict punishments which make citizens afraid lead to traffic accidents decrease steadily. Government has strict punishments in the economy is one way make they don't violate traffic laws. Next, penalties make they more aware while take part in traffic. Driving offences are not attention when they drive car, motor there for penalties make they attact special important to drive. With my opinion , all of us hope no more traffic accidents, consequently we must following the rules more carefully.
On the other hand, I admit that traffic accidents can promote by other measures. Firstly, it is vitally important to educate aware to decrease traffic accidents. Something which is beared in mind always better, alway remember follow the rules carefully help drives avoid traffic accidents. Secondly, traffic accidents are not all fault of drivers, it can due to bad road. Government should attention on reduce road accidents by invest more in better transport.
In conclusion, traffic accidents are alway bad problem. I believe that traffic accidents will be declined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | wardiati | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | mohammad.iraf | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | do tuan tu | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 56
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 61
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nts in the economy is one way make they dont violate traffic laws. Next, penalties m...
^^^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cial important to drive. With my opinion , all of us hope no more traffic accident...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59225436775 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58547008547 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8769618144 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.1875 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321444358678 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113187827547 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824902936892 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203033821554 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901766023901 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.