Do you think that place where person grew has an influence on this accomplishments? Explain with example. Region affects successful people?
The effect of environment on one’s success, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of breed location has sparked a controversy over the potential influence of this trend on adults’ future in recent years. Public’s opinion about location effect on one’s achievement varies from person to person as some people say people who grew up in developed countries have a better opportunity, while others say attitude determine one’s future. This essay focuses on the effect of raising environment of successful persons and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why people think that environment is a key element to success, but the most conspicuous one steams from the fact that compared to other countries, developed countries have advanced science and technology for the young generation since a possible explanation for this is might be that helps to explore passion and area of interest in the early age. For instance, recent evidence has shown that most scientists are from the United States. Thus, an environment can play a vital role to succeed.
Nevertheless, some people claim the opposing view and tend to believe that one’s attitude is also significant to accomplishment as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one is that strong interpersonal skill is important when facing challenges, because these results are likely to be related to the attitude of never give up. As an illustration, extensive research has shown that many entrepreneurs in China have face failure but never give up. Hence, the determination can play a critical role to achieve.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that interpersonal skills are prominent and there is abundant room for further progress in determining what the factor of accomplishment.
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 77
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Climate change / global warming / environment pollution. Roles that government, corporate, and individuals can play to improve it. 88
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40939597315 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09082809672 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.481479548 50.4703680194 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.545454545 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135753336344 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477954097464 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386815277817 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669786489001 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534093137806 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.