Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
I partially agree to the given recommendation because I find the decision to implement the recommendation by a nation's government is completely dependent upon the statistics of two major factors which are the percentage of hungry citizens in the nation and number of citizens unemployed especially if they are below poverty line. A government should know the inter-dependency of these two factors so that they can compensate for the need for the other one.
It is meaningless for a responsible government to spend its funds to purchase historical artifacts, paintings, sculptures, etcetera when there are citizens who do not get a bread to satisfy their hunger. The nation's development in building its national treasure is of no use if there are still significant citizens below the poverty line. Similarly, the government should first seek to make more and better job opportunities especially for the citizens who live below poverty line and also for the youth of the nation who are unemployed. Giving jobs to youth population of the nation is the best way to increase the nation's economy and its value in the world.
In opposition to the above-stated points, developing a national treasure owned by the government is also important for the nation to preserve its culture and ethics. But purchasing a painting for hundreds of millions of dollars when there are people who are homeless and do not any access to basic needs is worthless. Eventually, the nation will be segregated into two extremes of people belonging in rich class and in the poor class.
Imagine a time when a natural disaster or a recession in an economy or a calamity is on the verge to completely destabilize a nation, government at that time must give its priority for the wellness of its citizens rather than preserving its treasure of arts. At an extreme level, it should also consider a way to stabilize the situation by auctioning it's art gallery to other nations because arts lost can be earned by making more funds but valuable citizens lost due to no access for food would be a loss forever.
Therefore, the recommendation of funding the arts by a responsible government must be considered by taking into account various other factors and keeping its citizen's wellness first and topmost priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | AC1990 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | renmingliu | 66 | view |
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 54
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company."Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different constructio 46
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...on to implement the recommendation by a nations government is completely dependent upon...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'bread'.
Suggestion: bread
... when there are citizens who do not get a bread to satisfy their hunger. The nations de...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...et a bread to satisfy their hunger. The nations development in building its national tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... nation is the best way to increase the nations economy and its value in the world. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01842105263 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96682838013 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3444617416 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.916666667 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393948311727 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139205411638 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537067961909 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204213595657 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066523759085 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.