When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school, do you prefer to
work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day, or wait until you
have a good idea about the presentation?
In today's convoluted and competitive world, it becomes a highly charged and hot topic whether it is better for people to work on their presentation every day or start working as soon as they have a good idea. Therefore, some people are the leading proponent of the claim that waiting for until having a good idea would be better. However, some others may take an opposite point of view and believe that working on a presentation by spending little time on a daily basis bring more benefits for them. If I have to face these to choices, I tend to choose the latter idea. There are some significant reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, since people are assigned to work on an important project, they would be more productive to work on this project every day. People can start working by thinking about one idea and try to elaborate it by working on it, even for a little every day. Hence, by having one idea, they are able to investigate all positive and negative aspect of an idea meticulously to refine it. Let me give you an example might make this viewpoint much better. When I was a master student, we should have worked under the supervisor of a professor. After opting him, I was asked to think about the topic of my thesis during all the summer vacation. When told him this is a long period of time. Then. Dr. Nejati told me since your thesis is important, you should allocate a bit of time every day to find a suitable and novel topic. Finally, I could find a great topic. For this reason, by spending a bit of time every day, we are allowed to polish our idea to reach a novel of it.
Apart from the importance of spending much time on something, the second debatable point is that on the one hand, some people believe that consuming time on any projects on a regularly basis causes a disaster stressful situation because their mind is involved with this topic for a long time resulting in intensifying the degree of tension. On the other hand, some others believe that good idea will not come to people's mind until they work on it every day even for a little, and therefore, if they do not allocate their time to work on their project every day, owing to lack of an idea bring them more stresses and tensions. I take the former viewpoint with a pinch of salt and claim that the latter viewpoint is much more beneficial, for I do believe that the more people work on everything every day, the less they fall in a stressful situation. As a result, by working on everything persistently, they are allowed to be comfortable because everything goes well.
To wrap it up, by considering all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes the positive importance of working on project every day inasmuch as in the first place they have a great deal of time to consider all facet of the opinion and refine it effectively, and in the second place they are able to reach a good and impeccable idea without any stress and tension
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-24 | Mehrdad.imn | 70 | view |
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
- do you agree or disagree: it is better to use your own knowledge and experience to solve problems than to ask other people for advice 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 84
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you need to discuss upsettingor controversial problems with others, using email/text messaging is better than usingtelephone/voice-messaging. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... thesis during all the summer vacation. When told him this is a long period of time....
^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... vacation. When told him this is a long period of time. Then. Dr. Nejati told me since your th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('regularly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('basis') instead of another adjective.
... that consuming time on any projects on a regularly basis causes a disaster stressful situation b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...believe that good idea will not come to peoples mind until they work on it every day ev...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, as a result, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2458.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53505535055 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52495072274 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431734317343 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.2586130298 48.9658058833 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.9 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309153239518 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954478863055 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070756741684 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183723266646 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071018283811 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.