The Human may be able to live for 500 years or more. Would live for 500 years have positive or negative impacts on the world?
The twentieth century has brought it with many advances to the human life and with these advances, human life has changed dramatically. Now gerontologists are close to achieving the human lifespan expansion up to 500 years or more and the consequences of this have become a debatable topic. This essay will discuss why in spite of some benefits, there are several reasons it is inexpedient to expand the human life.
Longer lifespan will let grandparents spend a considerable amount of time with their grandchildren. Because of this, grandchildren are able to absorb invaluable life experience and lifestyle of people of bygone centuries. For instance, a person who lives longer life has generations of experience with him which can easily share and educate the young juveniles. Therefore, the greater lifespan accumulates a huge experience which is important for shaping up the future world.
Negative aspects of living for 500 years are far more apparent. The world has limited resources. If the birth rate continues with the same pace and the death rate drops drastically due to the huge expansion in lifespan, there will be much more pressure on the finite resources across the globe as well as it would lead up to a financial crisis. To sum up, increasing the human lifespan will aggravate the current global issues.
This essay discussed how the lifespan extending would help to build a better society and future but it can give birth to enormous new problems, which will eventually become a global crisis. In my opinion, the drawbacks of increasing the lifespan far outweigh the benefits, thus should not be encouraged.
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays 72
- Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat. 55
- The Human may be able to live for 500 years or more. Would live for 500 years have positive or negative impacts on the world? 77
- Drug advertisement. 77
- Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat. 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... inexpedient to expand the human life. Longer lifespan will let grandparents sp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1797752809 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8364846537 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2014758684 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.384615385 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237482808452 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903422395018 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123845410231 0.071462118173 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133353150286 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809846642377 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.