Should state museums charge visiting fees or that should be completely free?
What is your viewpoint on this issue?
Give reasons for your answer.
Some national museums have seen an persistent growth on their admission fees of most classes for past decades. While some hold to the negative sentiment that the charge of entering such a public facility should be either declined or made entirely free for all citizens, I personally believe that it is palatable for the operation team of museum to charge the visitors. The reasons for my position are as follows.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the running cost of a qualified museum is not negligible. In fact, operating a museum ensues numerous routine works like cleaning, repairmen, property management with ceaseless security control. That, coupled with the salary for tour guide who is responsible for organising tour and expound the detail of each pieces to visitors, results in the colossal expenditure. Moreover, to sustain the colour and vibrancy, a regular acquisition for exhibition has an important role to play, which in turn brings more attractions for visitors.
Further and more importantly, though, is that the antithetical view tends to paradoxically rise the cost for maintaining a museum. Some standing on the contrary argue that the fee is a barrier for people in penury, which then causes the amenity to be a playground for affluent families. However, there has been a special fee subsidising by the government for concession such as disabled, elderly and children of certain age group. Placing a full allowrence for all visitors is likely to result an influx to the museum, which then lead to a surge in operation cost, not to mention the hassles are to be induced.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that it is reasonable to buy a ticket prior to entering a museum, no matter public or private, because the visitor is responsible for the cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-01 | RockyGagKy | 84 | view |
- Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular It s because the internet 96
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.Do you 89
- Parents or other adult relatives should make important decisions for their (13 to 19 year-old) teenage children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your writing. 84
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Some national museums have seen an persistent growth on their admission fe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, in fact, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84998830407 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1798847481 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203517841061 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756330599695 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439650126686 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125524777484 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620596267258 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.