Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking?
Fast food vs. Sitdown restaurant?
The given four circular charts reveal the information about the budget of food spent on reataurant meals and home cooking, and second liner chart shows the information about the fast foid and sitdown restaurant meals during the year 1970-2000. The data is calibrated in both percentum and number which is clearly and coherently represented.
It is crystal clear from the charts, in the year 1970 the budget of food spent on home cooking was highest. In addition to this, during the year 2000 both restaurant meals either or home cooking had equal. Moreover, in the year 1970,1980 and 2000 the food budget spent on restaurant meals was 10%, 15% and 35% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that, the fast food meals had increased year by year. However, during the year 1970 to 1980 both meals were equal number. Moving futher, in the year 1980 to 2000 the sitdown restaurant meals was decreased as compare to fast food meals.
Overall, it is evident that the budget of food spent on home cooking had decreased year by year and the fast food meals was increased as compare to sit down restaurant meals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | Manpreetgill | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | Manpreetgill | 61 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.Water use, selected countries - 2000? 73
- The table below gives information about Favorite pastime in different cauntries in percentage. (/means data not avilable) 11
- The line graph shows the percentage of people living below poverty line(According to world standards) in developing countries for the year 1900 to 2050. 73
- The three pie charts below show the chnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 67
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking?Fast food vs. Sitdown restaurant? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41197011308 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447916666667 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1239114406 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443303821972 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222776745644 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130571402534 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33451090598 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764000813134 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.