One should have enough money to fulfill our basic needs and rest of the should be given to needy people. To what extent do u agree or disagree.
It is certainly true that money plays indispensable role to fulfill our basic needs. However, one of the most controversial here is of remaining money left after fulfilling our basic needs; should that money be given to needy or not? I am completely disagree with the given statement and shall explore the same facets in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are ample of reasons why the remaining money after fulfilling our basic necessities should not be given to the needy. First and foremost reason is hard work and struggle. The person who has huge amount money has earned it by hard work and struggle in their life. Moreover, they spent midnight lamps to earn it or to achieve. So they would never give their earned money to anyone because they are already paying taxes to the authorities for the development of the country. A best epitome of this is a recent survey, conducted by Hindustan Times revealed that more than 30℅ rich people deny to give their remaining money to needy people because they are already paying huge taxes for welfare of the country.
Secondly, why people do not agree to hand their remaining money to needy is due to misusage of that money. For instance, many beggars on the roadside or at any public places beg money not to fulfill their basic necessities: food, shelter and clothes but to use that money in evil deeds. Moreover, they start taking drugs at early age, and get addicted to them. In addition to this, they never utilise that money in good way which further decline their growth, and the level of country's poverty remained at same position instead of decreasing.
Nevertheless, as we have many answers to this question however, on balance I tend to believe that collide effort s of both individual and government can curb this issue because it is not only the responsibility of citizens but authorities too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-06 | Kaurrippan0@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Kaurrippan0@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing ( for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do u think the advant 73
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s 74
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 67
- The diagram below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 76
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
... given to needy or not? I am completely disagree with the given statement and shall expl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...he remaining money after fulfilling our basic necessities should not be given to the needy. First...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...ies for the development of the country. A best epitome of this is a recent survey...
^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...c places beg money not to fulfill their basic necessities: food, shelter and clothes but to use t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52940568167 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557993730408 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6033449627 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243675656854 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907460999936 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11370974291 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146067057631 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105363337327 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.