People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans are said to be either left-brained or right-brained, with both hemispheres differing substantially in their cerebral capacity, and their response mechanisms in the decision-making process. This suggests either a logical or an emotional bent and we can infer that decision making can be done in two ways. But agreeing to the statement, I believe poor decision makers are those who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards.
This is simply due to the fact that the entire decision making process should adhere to one school- either emotional or logical. An emotional decision is based on impulse, may be whimsical and governed by factors beyond logic. This decision is not based on data, statistics or has no quantitative support. Moving towards the logical decision we can say it is based on facts and reasoned thoroughly keeping a lot of quantitative factors in mind and keeping qualitative influences at bay.
When a person tries to justify an emotional decision on the basis of logic, he/she is trying to derive quantitative factors at a later stage which does not conform to the fundamentals of science or for that matter even the decision-making process. A decision which was initially made considering emotional context holds a different value than the one based on logic. Using any of the two ideas to justify the other would seem absurd and would not comply to any of them.
Though, if a decision made in a situation, which doesn't provide us with sufficient time frame to evaluate multiple factors and choose logic in the initial stages and relies heavily on emotion, shifts gears in the end to justify logically, wouldn't seem entirely wrong to me. Such decisions are made in the nick of time and that shouldn't stop the person from validating it logically even at a later stage. Doing so, will only increase his perspective and help him judge his own impulse-driven decisions accurately. It'll also help him build his instincts in the right direction. In a future scenario, he'll only be able to make a more informed decision that does not violate the boundaries of emotion or logic and at the same time is decided in a way deemed appropriate by both ideologies.
This helps us understand that selecting a side and considering a decision-making process is subject to a lot of parameters within and outside our control. A person should be more concerned with the considerations involved to make a decision and the impact of the decision rather then favoring a particular bent or structure of the process. In my opinion, strong or poor decision makers are made by their decisions and the impact they create on the world in general, rather than the means used to make a decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- "The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your 58
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 50
- "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer."Write a response in which you discuss the ext 79
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...f a decision made in a situation, which doesnt provide us with sufficient time frame t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... gears in the end to justify logically, wouldnt seem entirely wrong to me. Such decisio...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...s are made in the nick of time and that shouldnt stop the person from validating it logi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deemed appropriate by both ideologies. This helps us understand that selecting ...
^^^
Line 9, column 280, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...n and the impact of the decision rather then favoring a particular bent or structure...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, as to, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96086956522 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89282732037 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497826086957 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6329460963 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393897636149 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137042134144 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104571487899 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239944844425 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688167120528 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.