Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Past or history is an example for the present and future generations about how to and how not act in paticular incidents. The argument asserts that understanding of the past is of no or little importance to the present leaders. I strongly dissagree with that assertion. Following paragraphs will explain the reasons supporting my position.
Past will help the leaders on how to solve some problems which are already faced in the past. For example there are some nuances between some greatest nations like USA and Russia. Which might lead to a war between them. Here the past or the history will help them to resolve their problems with out a war saving a lot of lives and saving the mother earth. Hostory provides us with a lot of examples, in that there are good examples and bad examples. After choosing hitler as their leader germany has learnt a lesson by loosing a lot their resorces. So now they know on how to choose and whom to choose as their leader. History acts as book of pleathora of problems and their solutions. So the present leaders can look into the past, if they have any problems and can understand or come to a conclusion on how to act on that issue.
No one can become a good leader over night, they start in any field as a novice and will learn from their experiances. The same way history is giving them a record of experiances of different leaders. For example the newly elected precident of any country should understand the constitution of the contry which is written in the past, and consider doing changes to it, if it helps the people. He or she should understand the reasons the protocols followed, which are derived from the experiences in the past. If a country is planning on increasing the security standards against terrorists it should consider all the possible ways in the past how they entered the contry and also should think of other possibilities for them to enter the contry and restrict the terrorists from doing harm to the nation.
Yet history dose not always provide us with the greatest of the solutions. However in this rapidly developing world, the way we look at a problem has changed. Frequently this development will create unpresedented problems. For solving such problems our leaders should come the most effiecient and the best solutions to resolve them. These actions taken by the present leaders in resolving them will help the future leaders on resolving similar kind of problems.
All in all understanding the past will always be helpful for the leaders in succeding in their roles. Nonetheless understanding past is nothing but learning something. Gaining knowledge will always be helpful for any human being. So leaders should consider understanding the past to succede in their roles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-23 | GeneralBlitzer | 66 | view |
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
- you are planning to study abroad. what do 66
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 70
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through the 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ts that understanding of the past is of no or little importance to the present lea...
^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...le importance to the present leaders. I strongly dissagree with that assertion. Following paragrap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e greatest nations like USA and Russia. Which might lead to a war between them. Here ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...ill help them to resolve their problems with out a war saving a lot of lives and saving ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... us with the greatest of the solutions. However in this rapidly developing world, the w...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...he leaders in succeding in their roles. Nonetheless understanding past is nothing but learn...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84745762712 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64798981174 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46186440678 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0267692401 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7407407407 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4814814815 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.48148148148 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123430926174 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422046294697 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06134105906 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844072962335 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515655314364 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.