TPO-45
The reading lists out three hypotheses to doubt a theory which supported the possibility of the existence of bees before 200-million-year ago because of the discovery of old fossil structures that resemble bee nest. However, in the speaking, the speaker strongly disagrees with the points from the reading. There are three reasons she mentioned.
Firstly, even though the lack of fossils of actual bees until 100-million-years ago was real, the speaker argues that bees still existed possibly 200 million years ago. Based on the speaker's words, bee's bodies needed to be preserved by liquid from some unique species of trees. Since these kinds of trees was not common before 100-million-years ago, bee's bodies hardly became fossils. Therefore, the speaker thinks this evidence from the reading is not convincing enough.
Secondly, the reading mentions that the later appearance of flowering plants than the old fossils proved that bees could not exist before 200 million years ago. Nevertheless, the speaker contends that since bees in the past might live on other species of plants. Until the flowering plants showed up, bees evolved to adapt to them and gradually became stable. Therefore, the speaker asserts that it is still possible that the bees appeared earlier than flowering plants.
Lastly, the reading points out the fossilized structure found in Arizona lacked some parts of modern bees' nests, for example, the caps which exist in the chambers of bees' nests. Nevertheless, the speaker provides strong evidence to prove the similarity between bees nests and the fossilized structures. It is that bees would build their nest with some chemical material to prevent the nests from getting wet, the fossilized chambers, however, includes similar water-proof material.
In sum, the speaker provides three pieces of evidence to contend with the hypotheses mentioned in the reading.
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH TH 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble. Therefore, the speaker asserts that it is still possible that the bees appea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67443940841 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542087542088 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3378945022 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0441334651924 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180039675393 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0198375518031 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.026416803161 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021014814949 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.