TPO- Encyclopedia
In this set of materials, the reading passage discuss about on-line and non-on-line encyclopedia and says that on-line encyclopedia has many problems, and provides three reasons of support. The professor in the lecture does’t agree and explains that it not true, and she refutes each of the author’s reason.
First, in the passage the author claim that contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials, thereby making their contribuitions partially informed at best and downright inaccurate in many cases. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that is hard find errors in online and non online encyclopedia. However, if has one, can be correct easily while in traditional encyclopedia stay for decades.
Second, the author says that on-line encyclopedia gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia. The professor claim that in online encyclopedia the files has protections and they use file that can’t be changed by hackers, but in someone, the user could change the information, but these informations are reviewed before.
Third, the author says that frequently, great a depth, on trivial and popular topics, which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not. The professor state that the problems of traditional encyclopedia are the space, and they need to chose what is important or not. Beside that, on-line encyclopedia does’t have problems with space, and the article are disponible on the Internet.
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 60
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents 81
- "In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.” 60
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...article are disponible on the Internet.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55785123967 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0791890099 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570247933884 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0667283037 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225156993676 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10011440655 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607941628797 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143822465978 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269965875952 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.