Polygamy has led to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solutions for various situations to reduce the issues.
Recently, the phenomenon of polygamy has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is there any solutions to reduce it?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the polygamy has led to the high divorce rate, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, having multiple wives is bound up inextricably with breakdown families, which indicates it might lead to both traditional notions and religious viewpoints. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between polygamous society and dysfunctional families as well as an exponential increase in divorce rates. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to women empowerment, consent of partners, and strict law alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of consummating a happy marriage is correlated positively with not only sociocultural policies but also family commitments.
Within the realm of marital life, without the slightest doubt, a polygamous marriage attribute to separation, in that it would come down to jealousy and family crises. A salient example of such attribution is household expenses, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take equal rights for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint earlier wives problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the alimony, inheritance conflicts, and even domestic violence. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the monogamous relationship in a successful marriage.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that both people and governments are liable for reducing polygamy and divorce rates. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-17 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
- In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, aeroplanes, and computers. What do you think is the most important of them? 88
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals 84
- Working and living abroad helps us to know other cultures well. How far you think working abroad has good or bad impacts on our cultural lives? 77
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experiences. 77
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1207.87684729 157% => OK
No of words: 328.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78353658537 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2666071714 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673780487805 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 379.143842365 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.014648219 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.466666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122338715771 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305248488985 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497474476283 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802792338288 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655587269643 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 55.0591133005 240% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.