We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Speaker expresses a notion that agreement on an issue is a great way to learn things and also disagreement is stressful and inhibit learning. My position is it's opposite.
Disagreement is not always about winning a conversation, rather it is all about making a fruitful conversation and sometimes a way to have a new perspective and knowledge. Suppose, someone disagrees with me about a method I practice to do a task, then he or she can acknowledge me a new and better way to do it.
No argument is absolutely right or wrong. There can be both sides. For example, one may not support “Abortion” as for him or her, it is analogous to murder. On contrary, other may support “Abortion” as for some women, it is not the perfect time and condition to take care of a child.
Sometimes, being disagreed may be must when the opposite opinion or justify an injustice point. For example, some may agree on granting the death penalty for a minor crime. Then it is must to disagree as it is not justified to execute death penalty for conducting a venial crime.
Speaker here claims that disagreement causes stresses. But he or she did not show any empirical observation or evidence about it. Without any factual evidence, it can not make a valid point.
Speaker also claims that people learn things when they agree with each other. But it is not always true. When people agree and on the same page, they may have the same knowledge, points and logic about the issue. So there are no windows through which any new point or logic can entry.
People can learn things by having a good conversation. But does not mean that being on the same page is the only way to learn something, rather it is beneficial to disagree sometimes to acknowledge the new thing.
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 33
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 63
- “Over the past year, our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice doing'.
Suggestion: practice doing
...eone disagrees with me about a method I practice to do a task, then he or she can acknowledge ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...h penalty for a minor crime. Then it is must to disagree as it is not justified to exec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about it. Without any factual evidence, it can not make a valid point. Speaker ...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'disagree'.
Suggestion: sometimes disagree
...n something, rather it is beneficial to disagree sometimes to acknowledge the new thing.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69131832797 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9174567436 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504823151125 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4353254851 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.95 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.55 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127839617564 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425001759347 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468715573598 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665082082519 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350626231212 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.