Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of music learning in schools and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of hapiness is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded in thoroughly both contructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the children lifestyle can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the impact of music in children life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the music courses, as well as, physics courses are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiences, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the brain promotion. Thus, it is correct to suppose that the advantages of musical instruments are correlated negatively with educations.
Within the realm of science, learning of music might increase the consequences of the better life. Moreover, beneficial ramifications of musical impacts could relate to this reality that the demerits of the education pertain to the prosperity. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the benefits of music tutors are noticeable. Hence, I believe that the drawbacks of exams are dramatically more than its advantages.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, it is not logical to suppose that the music can be useful. Not only do the advantages of useful education prove the significance of the biology, but also pinpoint suitable feeling implications.
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. 80
- The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion? 85
- The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion? 85
- Government and international organizations facing global problems, provide solution. 96
- cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39615384615 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11766061211 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8427851629 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.916666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160183608998 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517647244452 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046364682837 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858776885682 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241164998073 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.