Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Educational institutions are one of the utmost and critical part of a student’s life. To meet the growing demands of education and ever increasing number of students along with economic inflation, the cost of institutions have also gone quite high. This makes the situation more complicated for students who have lower socioeconomic status which lead to them making a choice between attending the university and piling up loans which they might spent their whole life paying back, or to not attend the university at all. The merit students not attending the university is also a huge waste of potential talent. Naturally, public will demand justice and equality for those unfortunate and the government will have to at some point will have to address the issue.
The purpose of the above statement is to bridge the discussion of how the government could step in to resolve the situation. They could provide funding to assist the students in need of financial help or might waive their fee all together. Not only this policy helps in increasing the socioeconomic status of lower class people it also increases the overall literacy of the nation and helps maintain higher threshold of talent in the university. To further illustrate my point, take the example of Kerela, a relatively poor state in the 20th century had rose to become a distinguished state in India over last decade. Utilizing the above policy, it has now hundred percent literacy thanks to its state government giving full financial aid to any student in need and promoting educational programs and exhibits all across the state. It culminated to the state producing large number of talented graduates in various fields of science and technology in the last decade.
However, there is also a lot many ways this policy could be exploited. For example, a university is a profit-seeking corporation and getting funded by government may incite an institute to seek even more students to capitalize on the policy and make more money. This leads to overwhelming amount of students being admitted which the institute might neither have the required number of faculty for nor the proper amount of resources. Declination in quality of education is apparent in this case which is just polar to what the policy was made for. Students, too, might be tempted to provide misleading or fraudulent information in hopes of getting scholarship in order to get free university education. Since the government does not hold unlimited resources, this will lead to retracting the policy bringing everything back to square one.
This leads to the dilemma of weighing the positive consequences with the negative and determining if the advantages is worth the risk of the loss. One possible solution is that government should provide only limited amount of scholarship based on student’s need and it should be regulated by a third party to keep check on the respective student’s and the university’s background. This is to make sure no one could exploit the structure unrelentlessly so that the quality of the education could be maintained. The university should also have a strict criteria of the ratio between number of students, faculty and resources. Proper regulations should be laid out for the admission for the benefit of both the student and the university.
In conclusion, the policy in its bare bones format might be devastating to both the student and the government. The scarce government resources must be utilized in regulation and with proper screening of the affected parties such that exploitation is kept to bare minimum. Thus, the policy must be reviewed to achieve maximum benefit from it in the long run.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 83
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 81
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 567, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...he university should also have a strict criteria of the ratio between number of students...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, third, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3098.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 603.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13764510779 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9554069778 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92129862945 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499170812604 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 992.7 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0915226898 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.92 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.12 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203146613062 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051964814149 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463717369449 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106622079235 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541555934659 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.