With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value for artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area?
Recently, the phenomenon of the development of technology and science and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that there is no great value of being artists can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the things that artists can do but the scientists cannot provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, we should encourage the art area might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the great value of artists such as musicians and painters far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-28 | Mani.Narimani | 85 | view |
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Do you think people need to learn how to spend their money from early ages at school? 88
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. 85
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59923664122 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2165791347 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656488549618 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6212094898 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236040525467 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687989304348 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649658990507 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118985060904 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00813840391961 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.