The line graph illustrates the number of international travellers in five distinct countries (Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and USA) during the 15-year period from 1995.
The line graph illustrates the number of international travelers in five distinct countries (Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and USA) during the 15-year period from 1995.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that all the nations experienced upward trends over the period shown. Moreover, it is apparent that the figures for visitors to USA and France were the highest while Brazil was the least prevalent among the countries.
In 1995, nearly 70 million visits were paid to the USA while this number of France was just 30 million. The USA witnessed a gradual increase to 90 million in the number of visits in 2005, after that this number marginally fell to approximately 87 million in 2010 when France attracted the same quantity of visits after a sharp rose during the 15-year period. Similarly, the number of holiday makers going to Malaysia increased considerably to 50 million in 2010 from the starting point of just over 20 million in 1995.
Both Egypt and Brazil attracted nearly 8 million visitors in 1995. The two nations showed a similar pattern with a moderate climb during 15 years. In 2010, the figure for travelers was nearly 20 million and 17 million, in Egypt and Brazil respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-30 | Hau Nguyen | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over the last year. 11
- Task 1 writing - Women employed in four countries 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The table illustrates the number of people going to different tourist attractions in Australia during the four-year period from 1996. 78
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world. What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99014778325 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54877437585 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541871921182 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0228575309 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451254292531 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207077041152 0.103423049105 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.282008595037 0.0843802449381 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367593866514 0.15604864568 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.366241893613 0.0819641961636 447% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.