Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The given topic is trying to highlight the importance of scandals. Scandals, which are seldom exposed in the media, direct the viewer's attention to the component of a system which may not be very conspicuous to a layman. With this regard, my view is in compliance with the author's argument. I do agree that scandals need to be exposed at times if any problems are to be identified and hopefully be solved.
A layman, viewing the system from an indifferent perspective, doesn't know the intricacies of a system unless he is himself involved in it. With that being the condition, he never knows if the system is truly what it is portrayed to be or does it just pose a false mask in front of the pedestrians. Let us take this example: We, as a general public, always assume traffic police as a non-corrupt entity. But, unless we are ourselves involved in dealing with them, will never know how venal they are or how honest they are. But, if a scandal arises exposing the mercenary inclination of the traffic-police, definitely, we'd know more, and perhaps take the necessary steps to expurgate this problem from our society.
There is always some another system, like media, which exists to scrutinize the work done by a given system. But it may not always be the case that their way of examination perfectly captures all problems. They may have failed to capture parts of the system that scandals expose.
It is to be understood, however, that scandals don't always capture the general traits of a system. It could be, perhaps, that the exposed scandal is the only one that happened; the traffic police that we talked about earlier may only be a single corrupt person in the system. It is also possible that the so-called corrupt traffic police was only a victim of someone else's trap. If this is the case, it may be foolish to judge the person or the system based on the single case. So, it is prudent to make a proper investigation before accepting the authenticity of any scandal.
To summarize all that's been written, scandals are indeed important in revealing information that's been hidden from the society. However, the arisal of a single case should not be accepted blindly. A propitious investigation must be initiated to determine the credibility of the scandal and then suitable actions should be undertaken to overcome the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-10 | duskcloudxu | 58 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 70
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 58
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reas 58
- Have North Americans become too dependent on the automobile for travel? 91
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...seldom exposed in the media, direct the viewers attention to the component of a system ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...gard, my view is in compliance with the authors argument. I do agree that scandals need...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...system from an indifferent perspective, doesnt know the intricacies of a system unless...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ans. Let us take this example: We, as a general public, always assume traffic police as a non-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: WED_WE_D[1]
Message: Did you mean 'we'd'?
Suggestion: we'd
...tion of the traffic-police, definitely, wed know more, and perhaps take the necessa...
^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o be understood, however, that scandals dont always capture the general traits of a ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a single corrupt person in the system. It is also possible that the so-called cor...
^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ity of any scandal. To summarize all thats been written, scandals are indeed impor...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...deed important in revealing information thats been hidden from the society. However, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81683168317 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71954354018 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522277227723 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.632990332 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159409252445 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499861581598 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389904139419 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963377410356 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415751394541 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.