The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between
1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The graph illustrates the data in percentage of people aged 65 and over from 1940 to 2040 in three countries. Overall, the figures of all three countries are end up higher than that at the beginning of the timeframe.
First, people from 65 - or- over years old group in USA only took nearly one tenth of that country's population. In 40 years, from 1940 to 1980, the propotion seemed to rise gradually to 15 percent. From 1980 to 2040, USA is predicted to see another up trend from the figure which it likely to stay at round 23 percent.
Similar to the graph of USA is Sweden, the data of this country also followed the trend in the first 40 years which grew steadily from 7 percent to 14 percent. However, from 1980 to nowadays, the numbers seemed to flunctuate and in 2040 it is shown that the data will end up at 25 percent. On the other hand, the data of Japan was back and forth from 1940 to nowadays but still stay at 5 percent as the same in the beginning. But from then to 2040, there would be an outburst of people at 65 or over years old. This will lead to a significant jump from 5 percent to 27 percent at the end of the timeframe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-12 | hohadang99 | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 78
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement ? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to rise gradually to 15 percent. From 1980 to 2040, USA is predicted to see an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23181818182 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29578152376 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518181818182 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.3026904207 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.1 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119565702581 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065229725016 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066705476838 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113392053604 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683471176325 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.25 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.