The diagram below shows the development a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort.
Both the pictorial charts illustrate the evolution of small fishing European village in period of three decades .
With the given aerial view, i observed the highlighter is the enaromous development witnessed in small fishing hamlet. Specially, the population soaring to 80,000 from a bleak 12,000 with an addition of 50,000 during the peak season. While, the major changes witnessed were perishing of the traditional occupation such as rearing of sheep and goats, harbour, more emphasis was on beautification of breaches especially with mushrooming of hotel and skyscraper buildings for the tourists. Relatively, generating employment. Besides, the surgical removal off woodland and transforming into a golf course, an intiated step towards entertainment, while, olives changed into agriculture exclusively for catering hotel industry. In addition, homes were renovated for self employment with opening of shops. Surprisingly, it is noted the original village remained untampered.
In the nutsell, it can derived holistically this hamlet did undergo tremendous cosmetic change, unfortunately, also transformed into a concrete jungle. Apparently, the road has been instrumental in the influx of the population and giving access to this place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Fayna Faradiena | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-31 | Luta | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | traccle | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-14 | Simran tangri | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-14 | Simran tangri | 100 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. 100
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? 56
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in European countries in 1979 to 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparision where relevant. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...opean village in period of three decades . With the given aerial view, i observed...
^^
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... decades . With the given aerial view, i observed the highlighter is the enaromo...
^
Line 2, column 812, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent with opening of shops. Surprisingly, it is noted the original village remaine...
^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'derive'
Suggestion: derive
...ned untampered. In the nutsell, it can derived holistically this hamlet did undergo tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emendous cosmetic change, unfortunately, also transformed into a concrete jungle....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, if, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88397790055 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16316061468 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.718232044199 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.7240479547 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119089915536 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448165244869 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589569117881 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922584937327 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634141434319 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.06136585366 138% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.