The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The two pie charts compare the proportion of five types of energy production by the different sources in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, the major sources of energy were gas and coal in both the years while nuclear and other kinds of energy sources generated the minimum amount of energy in France. Petrol was the only source which reduced in the last year.
It is clear from the graph the graph, in 1995, energy produced by coal comprised of 29.80% and experienced a very slight increase of about 1% in 2005.Likewise, in the first year , gas generated 29.63% which rose marginally to 30.1% in the last year.
With regards to nuclear power and other sources, there was an approximate of 5% increase in the energy production and reached to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively. On the other hand, petrol was the only source which went down from 29.27% in 1995 to 19.55% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-21 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | yumnabilaf | view | |
| 2023-01-21 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, Californiaand the rest of the world. 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years1995 and 2005. 70
- Cambrige_Idioms_in_use_Intermediate 80
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
.... Overall, the major sources of energy were gas and coal in both the years while nu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the graph'.
Suggestion: the graph
...d in the last year. It is clear from the graph the graph, in 1995, energy produced by coal compr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Likewise
...ery slight increase of about 1% in 2005.Likewise, in the first year , gas generated 29.6...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t 1% in 2005.Likewise, in the first year , gas generated 29.63% which rose margina...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43964822356 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8370472385 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173085204522 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09841822379 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130568614214 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136429822449 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139500483005 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.