The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.
The table demonstrates the percentages of different notebook brands in the computer market between 2006 and 2014.
It is clear that all the brands’ market shares were similar in terms of upward patterns with the exception of Fujitsu’s and Lenovo’s which fluctuated. Overall, HP was the biggest shareholder in the computer market over the period.
In 2006, 31,4% of computar market went to HP, higher than the shares of Dell and Samsung combined. However, HP’s figure increased only by 3% in 2014, equivalent rate of Samsung’s which also grew to only 14.2% from 11.6%. The massive jump could be seen in Dell’s proportion, by 10% from 16,6% in 2014 in contrast to the mighty rise by only 2% of Toshiba’s.
The reversed trend could be observed in the percentage of other brands with the plunging down to only 7.11% in 2014 from the significant of 22.8 in 2006. Additionally, from 2006, the shares of Lenovo and Fujitsu reduced and bounced back to 8.12% and 7.10% respectively in the next eight years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Theagh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | cnade95 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | raminghorbanii | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhullarb476@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- More and more people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with theirfamilies and friends. Why does this happen? What are the effects on family and society as awhole. 56
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007. 78
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ere similar in terms of upward patterns with the exception of Fujitsu's and Lenovo's which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15204678363 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96559849955 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1696061804 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182340722045 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100393156966 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956617120041 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144401618647 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954346264283 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.