Some people say that to solve today global problem every nation should have a good relationship with other nation to what extent do you agree or disagree with statement
Good relations between countries are essential as nowadays one country may not only need help from another country with respect to social and economic growth but also can solve issues at the global level. Some people think that in order to solve international problems, healthy relations across countries are essential. However, others believe that a country should solve problems on its own.
Having a cordial relationship between countries is very essential for solving an international problem such as global warming. To begin with, we all know that India and USA are severely affected by the rise in temperature. Both countries can join hands together to prevent global warming only if they have good relations with each other. In addition, both countries could also come up with strategies to deal with pollution which is the major factor that leads to global warming.
Secondly, good relations across countries could even solve a social problem such as terrorism. Law amendments against terrorism should come in to act. As a result, the world would be saved from the terror attacks such as the attack on the world trade center. So, only if countries form good relationships internationally then the world will be a far better place to live safely and happily.
On the other hand, it is argued that building healthy relationships is not necessary since to solve a global level issue consumes a lot of time due to which problems will pile one on another and increase a headache for the constitution of countries. Supporters that are against building healthy relationships also say that rather than relying on another country, each country should be independent and solve problems on its own.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that cordial relationships between countries will not only solve social problems like terrorism but also make the world a better place to live by focusing on limiting the pollution. So, it is vital for countries to develop good relations with other countries for harmony and better future of coming generations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-18 | Prince sapkota | 88 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, even so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14714714715 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74678760363 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3923658561 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.266666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226231524132 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913254873578 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426028200893 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140959617709 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049620438662 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.