Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Laws are made for monitoring citizen's behavior in a forcing way, aim at maintaining the society stable and safety. Yet everything has two sides, the sweet candy for someone could be the poison for another one. Someone considers about some laws are unfair to a group of people, so he argues that people should only follow the fair laws and disobey even resist unfair laws. However, in my view, I mostly consider laws should be obeyed by everyone, as laws may seems like unfair, which in fact, they are fair enough to consider the society without thinking about specific person only.
Firstly, some laws are designed to be unfair to different groups of people for balancing stable of the whole society. Consider about the tax laws. In most country, tax laws require rich people to pay more tax rates than common people. It seems fair enough for the general people, but quite unfair to the rich people. Taxes are spending on increase and maintain public facilities and services, the tax law designed to keep the whole society work in a stable way, but not consider only minority people.
Furthermore, some laws are designed to maintain the long-term but not only the short-term development. Take the London Clean Air Act as an example. In 1952, the great smog in London killed around 4000 people, most people died as the reason of lung related diseases. The Clean Air Act was published because of this tragedy. Because the smog caused by the accumulated pollution exhaust from people's daily life and industrial activities, and the special weather in that winter. And not only air pollution, but also some other laws were published accordingly, London started to pay attention on air pollution from then on. like water pollution, wasted resource and some other potential crisis related with public health. Many factories were forced to shut down or modify their exhaust system, in short term, it seems unfair to decrease profits and productivity for the enterprises, however, in the long term, the clean and safe environment would help the enterprises to go further and get more benefits.
Finally, of course the world is run in an imperfect way, however, the laws could be modified and increased gradually to improvement. In my opinion, laws are the bottom line to maintain the society run stable and sustainable, to ensure everybody have a harmony life and respect to each other, I strongly agree that laws should be obeyed by everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-28 | AlexandraWei | 66 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds. 75
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes. 62
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a stable way" with adverb for "stable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...designed to keep the whole society work in a stable way, but not consider only minority people....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an imperfect way" with adverb for "imperfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... Finally, of course the world is run in an imperfect way, however, the laws could be modified an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, in fact, in short, of course, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95133819951 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47871098473 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5894727847 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.105263158 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14969667562 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461509482636 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052152888178 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102311422549 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599252865851 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.