A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
Having been recalled majority of our produce from the shelves has had a primate effective on the business, we cannot be complacent on the reports and assume on facts that could adulterate our findings.
Has there been a rundown to confirm, from where the majority of the reports originated from : are the complaints logged only from a particular region/stores or are the reports show no patterns of the complaint logged.
There is high possibility that our got contaminated when it made inc contact/near a chemical compounds leading to rot over time.
We cannot eliminate, any recent changes in the food composition that precluded the onsets of complaints.
From the compendium report we have confirmed that the chemical composition of the food shipped are compliant and FDA approved but little do we know of the reactions on certain animals when in contact with the food.
A apropos idea would be to personally issue a thorough check of the health and condition the effected pets were under.
Not devoting additional resources on the cause in conjunction with any additional complaints from the owners could have cataclysmic effects on our company, something that the market would not be able to condone in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 49 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 65 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | farhadmoqimi | 29 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Prudhvi6054 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | solankis304 | 29 | view |
- “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.” Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 79
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through 77
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 43
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he above sure does consume a lot of time , puts us in difficult circumstances but ...
^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... help the elderly cross over the bridge everyday, empowering a larger audience. The a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eradicated'.
Suggestion: eradicated
...larger audience. The argument is not eradicate and portray that the teachings of moral...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 2235.4752809 38% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 171.0 442.535393258 39% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01169590643 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.55969084622 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72859224708 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 215.323595506 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 704.065955056 40% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4002184765 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161267248264 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712225986134 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817701549523 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712225986134 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817701549523 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.