A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
All over the world, national curricula enable students to specialize in some specific areas and completely forsake others. Examples are numerous: IB, A levels, French Baccalaureate. Is this the right thing to do? Should a nation require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college? I believe that students should be allowed to choose some fields of specialisation. This will make their studies more interesting and vocational. Furthermore, they will be better prepared for university. However, one important prerogative for this recommendation is that students acquire a strong background in some crucial subjects such as mathematics, whatever the curriculum they opt for.
Why do I need to study physics at high school if I intend to become an economist? A young student asks. Indeed, many students hate school because they find many subjects irrelevant to their future careers. For instance, an aspirant economist might simply not understand why he has to learn how light travels across space or how electrons rotate. Enabling students to specilize will definitely make their studies more captivating. And, more motivated students shall be more successful.
Some may argue that at this early stage of their lives, students do not know yet their future career paths. However, students definitely know what their weaknesses and abilities are. Therefore, they can choose their predilected subjects and fathom them. Instead of acquiring superficial knowledge in everything, they will dive deeper into some specific areas. As they hone their skills, they will be better groomed to succeed at university.
Of course, this recommendation is predicated on students having achieved a certain level of knoweldge in some curcial subjects. For instance, history is very important. If the young person does not know some basic dates and fact about World War II for example, he won't be able to become a good citizen. Furthermore, his knoweldge being extremely limited, he may be considered an ignorant among his friends. Ergo, some subjects such as mathematics and history should be taught in all curricula, probably at different levels of difficulty though.
I think enabling students to specialise at an early stage of their careers is good. Those who still do not know what they want to do in life will simply choose the subjects they excel in. Those who do know, will be extremely happy to gain more elaborated knowledge. After all, motivation is the key to success!
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-10-27 | ralfraihat | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 90
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 90
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of 85
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 80
Sentence: I believe that students should be allowed to choose some fields of specialisation.
Error: specialisation Suggestion: specialization
Sentence: Enabling students to specilize will definitely make their studies more captivating.
Error: specilize Suggestion: specialize
Sentence: Of course, this recommendation is predicated on students having achieved a certain level of knoweldge in some curcial subjects.
Error: curcial Suggestion: crucial
Error: knoweldge Suggestion: knowledge
Sentence: Furthermore, his knoweldge being extremely limited, he may be considered an ignorant among his friends.
Error: knoweldge Suggestion: knowledge
Sentence: I think enabling students to specialise at an early stage of their careers is good.
Error: specialise Suggestion: specialize
flaws:
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.321 21.0
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.252 0.35
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 28 15
No. of Words: 401 350
No. of Characters: 2045 1500
No. of Different Words: 219 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.475 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.1 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.723 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.321 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.188 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.536 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.252 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.435 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5