The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The bar graph illustrates the consumption frequency of people in fast food restaurants, which are located in the USA, in 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, according to the data collected in 2003 and 2006, most people in the USA consumed their food in fast food restaurants once a week, while in 2013, majority of people went to these restaurants once or twice a month. On the other hand, people who ate in fast food restaurants every day was the lowest percentage.
In 2003, approximately one third of people consumed their food in fast food restaurants once a week. Similarly, 30% of people chose eating their fast food once or twice a month. In this year, people who ate in fast food restaurants every day was only 4%, as opposed to 5% who never ate in these restaurants.
In 2006, people mostly consume their food in fast food restaurants once a week (around 33%). Compared to the case in 2003, very small fraction of people (about 2.5%) ate in fast food restaurants every day, which is around 1.5% lower than that of in 2003. Also, people who have never eaten in fast food restaurants was again 1.5% lower than the fraction in 2003 (around 4%).
In the last year, in 2013, most people decided to go to fast food restaurants once or twice a month (nearly 33%). However, percentage of people who ate every day or have never eaten in fast food facilities were very low and same as in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | zoltry | 73 | view |
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 83
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to eat'.
Suggestion: to eat
... a week. Similarly, 30% of people chose eating their fast food once or twice a month. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 937.175257732 122% => OK
No of words: 250.0 206.0 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.576 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44171742837 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424 0.622605031667 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 290.88556701 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4434757332 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 76.5299724578 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 16.8248392259 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 4.34317383033 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405604202457 0.216113520407 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222502246366 0.0766984524023 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476393033963 0.0603063233224 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296909777502 0.12726935374 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399651210891 0.0580467560999 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 8.71597938144 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 7.59969072165 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 41.2886597938 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 8.15463917526 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.