Essay topics:
Panda population
Whereas principles of increasing pandas in China attribute to wild pandas and conservation organizations, the significance of technical support from WWF would relate to not only population size but also habitat area, so as not to undermine the implications of conservation policies, the Chinese government, nature reserves and boosting wild giant panda population.
Votes
This essay topic by users
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-10 | SamiraTalebi | 22 | view |
Essay Categories
Essays by user SamiraTalebi
:
- Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships Do you agree with this opinion Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea 49
- Panda population 22
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and lesspeople use cash. How realistic do you think it is and do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 88
- The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 85
- More and more people are moving to the urban areas, and therefore many cities are now becoming increasingly over-crowded. Provide solutions to deal with this issue. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.5418719212 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 20.9802955665 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 31.9359605911 25% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 312.0 1207.87684729 26% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 53.0 242.827586207 22% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88679245283 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.69816787641 3.92707691288 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38509706869 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 42.0 139.433497537 30% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.792452830189 0.580463131201 137% => OK
syllable_count: 100.8 379.143842365 27% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6551724138 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 20.5024630542 259% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 50.4703680194 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 312.0 104.977214359 297% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.0 20.9669160288 253% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 26.0 7.25397266985 358% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310297084945 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.310297084945 0.0925447433944 335% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310297084945 0.151781067708 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.8 12.6369458128 260% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -7.7 53.1260098522 -14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.54236453202 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.5 10.9458128079 251% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 17.77 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 13.71 8.32886699507 165% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 55.0591133005 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 33.5 9.94827586207 337% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.3980295567 223% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 10.5123152709 266% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 22.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.