The most effective way for the government to conserve energy is to increase the price of the gasoline and electricity
Nowadays, modern style of life made people to use of gasoline and electricity. So this types of energy become more important in their daily life. Also many people do not have any idea about conservation of energy. So governments should do something for conserving energy. In my opinion increasing the price of these kind of fuel can help governments to save energy for future. I have some reasons for this idea that explain below.
First and principal reason is, people should inform that fossil energy could be exhausted in the future. Also by increasing price of gasoline and electricity people made to use another kinds of energy for saving their money. So they have to displace renewable energy like solar energy instead of gasoline and electricity. For example, one of my uncle uses solar cell in his home for heating water and space. If the price of energy increase he has to use solar energy for his home’s lights. With the government increase the price of energy the uses of that become decrease.
In addition, using vehicles that work with fossil sources of energy causes air and environmental pollution. This evidence causes many disease and ascend mortality. Accordingly, governments by increasing the price of energy made researchers to take place new kind of machines. For instance, some countries like Japan makes a kind of car that work with solar energy. These cars have many benefits. For example, this is cheap and small, so this is useful for travelling intra city. According to this reason, I believe increasing the price causes new innovation.
To sum up, for what have been discussed above, increase price of gasoline and electricity made people and researchers to decrease their use of fossil energy and displace renewable one instead. Also this theory help government to save energy for future. At the end I suggest that, decrease using gasoline and electricity to have better life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-14 | shivayousefi | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and e 60
- The most effective way for the government to conserve energy is to increase the price of the gasoline and electricity 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ome more important in their daily life. Also many people do not have any idea about ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
.... In my opinion increasing the price of these kind of fuel can help governments to save en...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nergy could be exhausted in the future. Also by increasing price of gasoline and ele...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disease seems to be countable; consider using: 'many diseases'.
Suggestion: many diseases
...nmental pollution. This evidence causes many disease and ascend mortality. Accordingly, gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
..., I believe increasing the price causes new innovation. To sum up, for what have been discu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rgy and displace renewable one instead. Also this theory help government to save ene...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, if, so, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04716981132 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61165557226 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465408805031 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4829417278 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9545454545 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 4.33554083885 392% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374712932747 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126612494452 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939077336689 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266734966677 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650650871925 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.