Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of law enforcement has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “can law change human behavior?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that introducing the law can alter an individual’s attitudes, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the ethical and social standpoint, patterns of behavior are bound up inextricably with social norms, which indicate it might lead to both law-abiding and unlawful activities. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between moral corruption and committing a crime as well as an exponential increase in violent acts. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to rehabilitation, community services, and severe punishments alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of observing the law is correlated positively with not only shaping social conducts but also developing better habits.
Within the realm of legislation, without the slightest doubt, crime prevention attribute to enforcing the law, in that it would come down to the death penalty, harsh sentences, and passing a fine. A salient example of such attribution is juvenile delinquencies, which is a cause for concern since they were mistaken to take legal advice for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to existing rule’s problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to legal responsibilities, state legislatures, and even tough regulations. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of enacting strict laws in altering individual’s traits.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that law can change human behavior. Meanwhile, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
- More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time. Do you think this is realistic in our life today? To what extent do you agree with this statement? S 88
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...question can law change human behavior? Whereas it is a widely held view that imposing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63537906137 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05873975809 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682310469314 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9945197521 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250378584837 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643928966064 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125962532787 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161089010808 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139599457244 0.0609392437508 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.