Learning a new language at an early age is useful for children. Will this have a positive or adverse impact on children?
We encounter people with different perceptions about anything that we see, do or experience. With regards to whether learning a new language also, we can witness people holding two sets of opinions. One set of believes that exposure to the new language can benefit us in multiple ways whereas the other set of people may have an opinion quite different from the other. I have a mixed opinion pertaining to the current topic. I certainly see many advantages and at the same time, I would like to highlight disadvantages on the same topic
When, it comes to merits on learning a different language, we are pretty sure there can be a range of benefits. These benefits are not limited to few age groups. It serves a great purpose to people of various age groups. Sometimes we might feel that one particular age group gets the best advantages when compared to the other categories. One can become multilingual and it may be useful in the future in this competitive world.
When we look at anything we can also find darker side along with brighter side. The same can have relevance with regards to this topic. When a person fails to make the best use anything, it can turn out to be disadvantageous and it can have a detrimental impact. One needs to be extra cautions in this connections.
It can be concluded that one would better strike a balance between what is beneficial and what can be harmful. Hence, it is always advisable to direct one's effort in the right direction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-17 | chanikya venkatesh | 55 | view |
| 2018-10-17 | chanikya venkatesh | 55 | view |
- Some people believe laws change human behaviour. Do you agree with it. 55
- Learning a new language at an early age is useful for children. Will this have a positive or adverse impact on children? 55
- Some people believe laws change human behaviour. Do you agree with it. 55
- some people feel that assessment through formal written examinations is valid.do you agree or disagree with it? 79
- Some people feel that assessment through formal written examinations is valid.do you agree or disagree with it? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning a new language also, we can witness people holding two sets of opinions. One...
^^
Line 1, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ighlight disadvantages on the same topic When, it comes to merits on learning a d...
^^^^
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...enefits. These benefits are not limited to few age groups. It serves a great purpo...
^^
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the future in this competitive world. When we look at anything we can also find da...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l impact. One needs to be extra cautions in this connections. It can be conclud...
^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...act. One needs to be extra cautions in this connections. It can be concluded that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, may, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67692307692 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69575603342 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.6157635468 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3218765477 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0666666667 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 7.25397266985 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135229430205 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049885056752 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335691383672 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779163900994 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456239383665 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.5310837438 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.