The graph below show how elderly people in Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010.
The given line chart shows the number of elderly people spent in free-time from 1980 to 2010, measures tons of percent, in Europe.
Overall, it is difference that the figure for elderly people more spending hiking than other types of sports.
It can be seen that, In 1980, Hiking were spent by 20% elderly people,compared with Surfing the Internet only 0% elderly people, and it the following year, there were 10% elderly people by Surfing the Internet and 40% were spent by Hiking. In the next two years, the largest increase in readership has been for Hiking, at 80% and around 50% elderly people spent in Surfing the Internet. In addition to that, the number of elderly people spent in playing sport that having dropped slightly in 2010, at just under 70%, compared with in 2000, attracting 70%. After increasing dramatically from 1980 to 1990, the reader slight dropped, and then rising dramatically in 2010 and starting at 50% elderly people in 1980, the rate of elderly people decreased significantly in 1990, and then dramatical decreasing to reach a peak of around 45% in the next two years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , compared
... Hiking were spent by 20% elderly people,compared with Surfing the Internet only 0% elder...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 937.175257732 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90425531915 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50022633652 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 16.3608247423 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7058218349 44.8134815571 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 76.5299724578 201% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 16.8248392259 186% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 4.34317383033 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303732083595 0.216113520407 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162317124686 0.0766984524023 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893024847185 0.0603063233224 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219198907784 0.12726935374 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111344449963 0.0580467560999 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 8.37731958763 207% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 41.2886597938 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 8.54432989691 169% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.