Reading passage
A win-win negotiation is concluded when both parties gain something of value in exchange for making concessions. Although the balance of power may change during the negotiation process, negotiators on both sides must remain open to options that will ultimately allow for a fair exchange. To achieve a resolution that benefits both parties, everyone involved must be willing to listen carefully to each other's concerns. To arrive at a conclusion that is good for everyone, negotiators must reveal what they value and what they do not value. Good negotiators look for something that their side does not value but to which the other side assigns a high value. By offering it, they lose nothing, but the other side gains something, thereby feeling more disposed to concede something that the other side perceives as valuable. In addition to listening for ways to help the other side, everyone has to be aware of the limitations that both sides may bring to the table. There are some options that cannot be explored because they are not possible for one of the parties. For example, a price that does not allow a profit margin for the company that manufactures it is not a point of negotiation, unless the other side can offer a way to increase profits or productivity. If that isn't possible, then perhaps a service that saves the buyer money might be a way to balance the firm pricing structure of the goods.
A win-win negotiation allows both parties to feel that they made a good deal, but another positive outcome is the way that the people involved feel about each other. In traditional bargaining, people on opposite sides of a negotiation tend to view each other as adversaries, a relationship that is often difficult to change after the negotiation as collegues who want to support each other's success. When the deal has been made and the collaboration begins, the people involved are already committed to working together for their mutual benefit.
Professor:
Let me tell you about a case study that is often used as an example of how a win-win situation can be negotiated by both parties. Tony was a computer software designer who had come up with a great idea for a computer game, but his problem was that he couldn't afford to quit his job while he worked on the game because he had to make a living for his family. He thought it would probably take him about a year to actually complete the programming for the game if he worked in his spare time. Okey. Well, he put together a proposal, and took it to a multinational company that had launched several successful computer games. But the problem was that the company made him a very low offer - just a thousand dollars a month for twelve months. And although that would have paid his bills during the time that he would have been working on the program, he knew that the game had a huge potential for return on the company's investment. So he felt like he would be taking all the risk without having the opportunuty to share in the reward. But when the company refused to give him any additional upfront money, then, instead of getting angry, Tony went back with a counteroffer. He agreed to accept the $12,000 as an advance on the profits that he expected the game to generate.
And he suggested that they share the future revenues in a ratio of 40:60 - 40 percent for Tony and 60 percent for the company. The company was interested, but explained to Tony that they would be investing over a million dollars in order to produce and market the game and would need a larger share in order to proceed. So they agreed on a 30:70 split. And, as it happened, the game was a big success, the company made a huge profit and Tony was able to quit his regular job and start his own game design company. So - everybody won. They were both able to minimize their risk and increase their profits.
Question: Summarize the main points made in the reading passage, and then explain how the case study from the lecture supports the reading.
As the author in the passage suggests that a win-win negotiation is gained when both the parties have something to gain. There are basically different ways to achieve such benefits which firstly includes listening properly to each other’s concern and coming to a conclusion that is beneficial for both sometimes by offering the other side the benefit if it does not bring any loss to the former side except for some limited cases which are not feasible to one of the parties. Secondly, good negotiation takes place where both of the parties and the members are satisfied about their decisions and are willing to help each other for mutual benefit.
The speaker supports the reading and gives an example of a man named Tony to support the study of win-win negotiation. Tony is a computer game programmer and is designing a game which will take him around a year to complete. He takes a proposal of the game he’s developing to a multinational company which he thinks has a huge potential. The company offers him $1,000 pay per month. He expects more but the company refuses so he counter-offer it by taking what he has been offered as a future revenue of his game and asks for a 40:60 share but again the company is not willing because the company needs more shares and hence he agrees on 30:70 that is Tony gets a 30 and company gets the 70 percent of the shares. As Tony had anticipated, after a year his game becomes a huge success and the company gets a huge profit which means Tony also has his share of profit. Finally, he is able to quit his previous job and get involved in game designing. This was a win-win negotiation from which the parties, that is, the multinational game developing company and Tony both gained something. Thus, the speaker concludes by saying that this kind of negotiation is gained by minimizing the risk and increasing the profit.
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work 80
- Integrated essay Reading In a vote that took place at the International Astronomical Union Conference on August 24th 2006 Pluto lost its status as a planet in our solar system Pluto was originally discovered in 1930 when scientists were searching for some 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents arethe best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to supportyour answer 73
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 75
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 76
Comments
Thank you so much. I have
Thank you so much. I have never written any integrated essay before, so I was wondering if my format is correct and where do I need to improve?
Thank you once again for your kind help.
The correct pattern for real
The correct pattern for real TOEFL:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Don't need to reiterate the contents of reading passages or as less as possible.
Don't need a conclusion.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
benefits which firstly includes
benefits which firstly include
Sentence: He expects more but the company refuses so he counter-offer it by taking what he has been offered as a future revenue of his game and asks for a 40:60 share but again the company is not willing because the company needs more shares and hence he agrees on 30:70 that is Tony gets a 30 and company gets the 70 percent of the shares.
Description: The fragment he counter-offer it is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace counter-offer with verb, past tense
flaws:
No. of Words: 332 250
Number of Paragraphs: 2 4
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 332 250
No. of Characters: 1510 1200
No. of Different Words: 167 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.269 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.548 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.519 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.085 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.476 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.192 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 4