The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The given chart illustrates the frequency the Americans consumed fast food in restaurants during the 10-year period, from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it is explicit that throughout the surveyed period, most Americans ate fast food moderately, while the percentage of people never ate or ate on daily fundament remained absolutely low.
In 2003 and 2006, a similar pattern occurred approximately 31% and 33% of people in the US opted to consume fast food once a week, the highest figure in both years. Coming in close second, short by 1% and 8% were the ratios of people eating it once or twice a month. Meanwhile, the lowest figures belong to eating every day and never eating equivalent 4% and 5% respectively.
A different picture happened after 7 years in 2013. A significant number of people decided to briskly cut down on fast food eating habit from once a week to once a month, making the monthly rate peak at 33%, compared to 28% of weekly rate. On the other hand, everyday and never eaters' rate achieved the lowest as only 3% and 4% decided to do.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any 73
- The plans below show the layout of university's sport centre now and how it will look after development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparisions where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... 28% of weekly rate. On the other hand, everyday and never eaters rate achieved the lowe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73513513514 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56892709384 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7559763856 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248695619595 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984392124246 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889899961977 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162417271311 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727177589314 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.