Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom.
Do you agree with this statement?
What is an alternative to traditional face-to-face teaching?
Some people argue that, in the close future instead of teachers, we will be seeing artificial intelligence teaching in schools. I personally don`t believe that AI can completely take over teachers` task in the classroom and certainly not think that it can happen any time soon. However, we can`t deny that the old school teaching has already been evolving and new teaching methods using technological advances can be implemented into our conventional face-to-face education system.
Despite all the advancement we experience with AI in all aspects of our lives, it is undeniable that it has potential and capacity to take part in the education system and even replace the position of teachers in schools. However, I don`t believe that it has not reached to that point and personally, I don`t believe that it can happen in the foreseeing future. First of all, especially in the education of youngsters, human contact is crucial to make them feel safe and secure in the classroom. Furthermore, the compassion and understanding they seek at those ages cannot be provided by a machine no matter how intelligent it can be, but it can be assured by a teacher.
However, traditional teaching methods can be altered, and new technological developments can be implemented as an alternative to conventional face-to-face teaching. Online computer systems can help teachers updating with all new findings and passing that knowledge to the students. Nowadays every classroom has a computer in the classroom so that any question can immediately be searched and be answered with visual demonstrations. Moreover, it can be used to help students to continue their learnings not only limited in the classroom but wherever or whenever they are by online connection with the selected and pre-controlled resources. For example, most of the schools are encouraging children to use ipads for doing their homework, reaching to their teacher and peers for discussions.
AI is reaching and taking over most of the jobs, but I don`t believe that teaching in the classroom and replacing teachers is one of them. However, I believe that technological advances such as, using computers in the classrooms and not stopping there and advancing it even outside of the classes can and should be integrated with our traditional education system.
- The chart shows the number of female and male people arrested by type of offence crime 46
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed. 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children`s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 61
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive 67
- Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars Why is this happening Is it a positive or negative development 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...ial intelligence teaching in schools. I personally don't believe that AI can completely take o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28686327078 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13619527547 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509383378016 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.322970829 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208837387783 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779776407418 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504868483224 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137355602238 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433419754195 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.