Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Our civilization balances on the fine line of morality; on one side it's the measuring stick to give the acceptance of society at large on the other side is the abandoned immoral beings ostracized as unsocial or even anti-social. The guidelines of moral rectitude, as perceived by a society, is the sieve to filter and at the same time the encouragement for everyone to follow the societal normalcy. It's the logical reasoning of humans that ascertains such behavioral ethics and gives the capability to discern what is right and wrong given no formal guidelines are there to decide at a completely new situation.
For a child learning at a kindergarten on how to respect parents may be a first step to impart such foundation, it's the why and what that makes the more impact. Those inquisitive minds are better in logical reasoning than the grown ups, bogged down by rules. Giving the rationale behind such aspects will improve the morale of the populace from the grass root level. The morality should teach a school student on how to keep one's surroundings clean, but the reasoning behind it would give them a better perspective. Cleaning their surrounding should not interfere with dirtying other area. Nitpicking every such detail in the education system will derail the whole system and get overwhelmed by such books on morality and yet will fail to cover all such considerations. Giving them the reasoning that, cleanliness is deserved by everyone and it's the matter of health and hygiene, will help them help others to understand the such fact and would trickle down to everyone in the society and would have a larger impact.
Again, morality may tell someone in one society that it's alright to hold hands with your friends, yet other society may have different understanding of such friendliness. One society may ask to wear certain kind of clothes, while the other may differ in their idea. Now such things can give rise to arguments as to why would society ask one to behave such a way. And yet again, the "why" took the reasoning to find the rationale behind such behavior. And that's what brings open mindedness to a society and bettering the morale at large.
Thus it's the logical reasoning that takes higher importance over teaching morality in educational system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you 50
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 66
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 66
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 73
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... the fine line of morality; on one side its the measuring stick to give the accepta...
^^^
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...eryone to follow the societal normalcy. Its the logical reasoning of humans that as...
^^^
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...a first step to impart such foundation, its the why and what that makes the more im...
^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d teach a school student on how to keep ones surroundings clean, but the reasoning b...
^^^^
Line 2, column 843, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...cleanliness is deserved by everyone and its the matter of health and hygiene, will ...
^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...the rationale behind such behavior. And thats what brings open mindedness to a societ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ty and bettering the morale at large. Thus its the logical reasoning that takes hi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...d bettering the morale at large. Thus its the logical reasoning that takes higher...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, thus, while, as to, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9274611399 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73861523825 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531088082902 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2832935825 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142985855663 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545752210187 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397112197582 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102737422193 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430920310175 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.