The table below shows how many students of a school in the UK chose to take part in four
different sports between 2001 and 2011.
The graph demonstrates the number of students of a particular UK school who participated in
running, basketball, swimming and football over a ten-year period from 2001 to 2011.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that while the popularity of running grew over the period
in question, and that of football remained high throughout, the number of students interested in
basketball fell sharply. Swimming figures, meanwhile, saw an increase followed by a drop.
With regards to running and swimming, the starting figures were roughly identical at 18 and 20
participating students respectively. However, whereas the former climbed to reach 60 students in
2007 before levelling off for the remainder of the period, the latter peaked at 50 students in 2006
and then slipped to half this figure in 2011.
Turning to the ball sports, football stayed consistently popular, with student figures remaining
between 60 and 70 throughout the period. Basketball’s popularity was nearly as high as football’sin the first half of the decade studied, with the number of participating students rising from 55 to 61,
but 2006 to 2008 saw student numbers crash to 21, a figure which had not changed by 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-16 | Ly8 | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-26 | Sukchain appur 56 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...particular UK school who participated in running, basketball, swimming and footba...
^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut, the number of students interested in basketball fell sharply. Swimming figure...
^^^
Line 6, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ures were roughly identical at 18 and 20 participating students respectively. How...
^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e former climbed to reach 60 students in 2007 before levelling off for the remain...
^^^
Line 8, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the latter peaked at 50 students in 2006 and then slipped to half this figure in ...
^^^
Line 10, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... popular, with student figures remaining between 60 and 70 throughout the period....
^^^
Line 11, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icipating students rising from 55 to 61, but 2006 to 2008 saw student numbers cra...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30927835052 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06842642522 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6242729808 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129195495677 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621524876948 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487185246904 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513250521091 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405789374368 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.